<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spammers : Do We Need Them? The Answer Might Surprise You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ritubpant.com/spammers-do-we-need-them-the-answer-might-surprise-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ritubpant.com/spammers-do-we-need-them-the-answer-might-surprise-you/</link>
	<description>Social Web, Media, Ideas and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:05:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://ritubpant.com/spammers-do-we-need-them-the-answer-might-surprise-you/comment-page-1/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritubpant.com/?p=713#comment-953</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweets about this great post on TwittLink.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweets about this great post on TwittLink.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ritu B. Pant</title>
		<link>http://ritubpant.com/spammers-do-we-need-them-the-answer-might-surprise-you/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritu B. Pant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritubpant.com/?p=713#comment-952</guid>
		<description>Hey Shiju, thanks for sharing the &quot;king story.&quot; You bring up an awesome point in regards to all the other development and security advancements that come along because of the spammers. 

@bgr : Amazing! There is always a positive side to everything and am glad you are looking at the brightest side of it. Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Shiju, thanks for sharing the &#8220;king story.&#8221; You bring up an awesome point in regards to all the other development and security advancements that come along because of the spammers. </p>
<p>@bgr : Amazing! There is always a positive side to everything and am glad you are looking at the brightest side of it. Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgr</title>
		<link>http://ritubpant.com/spammers-do-we-need-them-the-answer-might-surprise-you/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>bgr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritubpant.com/?p=713#comment-951</guid>
		<description>I agree with your point of view  thinking of spam as necessary evil that might eventualy bring some inspiration for good efforts.Always look at the bright side of spam! ;-) 

Developers of spamfilters are heroes, not just fighting the technologic battle under constant attack of bandwith desire, but also desinfecting the net from stupid and ugly ideas. When you  think about the most content of spam = porn, gambling , drugs/ viagras /whatever overdose, false degree certificates, pirate software, stupid replicas.. .which is all just  hunt for luxury and pleasures...  i wish only spammers think anything of that can make life good and happy, and wish for them to realize soon that its not about that.


Next idea coming to my mind is : regardless of how smart and well-set my mail-app spam filter is, I still  have to make a brief look at content of my spambox folders. And it often means I do it many times through day, just to check if some non-spam message eventually didnt lost ist  way to me. And it happens occasionaly.

And the last but not least topic: I recently got the best spam in my life!
  Actually it was spam delivered by classic (non-electronic) post mail- and it was the original english Spam can of chopped pork and ham :-) (Monty Python´s Flying Circus idea) I think this can is going to be icocinc just like Campbell´s soup is thanks to A. Warhol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your point of view  thinking of spam as necessary evil that might eventualy bring some inspiration for good efforts.Always look at the bright side of spam! <img src='http://ritubpant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Developers of spamfilters are heroes, not just fighting the technologic battle under constant attack of bandwith desire, but also desinfecting the net from stupid and ugly ideas. When you  think about the most content of spam = porn, gambling , drugs/ viagras /whatever overdose, false degree certificates, pirate software, stupid replicas.. .which is all just  hunt for luxury and pleasures&#8230;  i wish only spammers think anything of that can make life good and happy, and wish for them to realize soon that its not about that.</p>
<p>Next idea coming to my mind is : regardless of how smart and well-set my mail-app spam filter is, I still  have to make a brief look at content of my spambox folders. And it often means I do it many times through day, just to check if some non-spam message eventually didnt lost ist  way to me. And it happens occasionaly.</p>
<p>And the last but not least topic: I recently got the best spam in my life!<br />
  Actually it was spam delivered by classic (non-electronic) post mail- and it was the original english Spam can of chopped pork and ham <img src='http://ritubpant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  (Monty Python´s Flying Circus idea) I think this can is going to be icocinc just like Campbell´s soup is thanks to A. Warhol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiju Alex</title>
		<link>http://ritubpant.com/spammers-do-we-need-them-the-answer-might-surprise-you/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiju Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritubpant.com/?p=713#comment-947</guid>
		<description>Ritu, your post reminded me of the story of a King who hated mosquitoes but became thankful when a mosquito bite awakened him before the enemies reached to him.

You do have a strong point. Another angle to look at it is how the spam challenge the developers.

I think the Google algorithm (and other algorithms) would not be this developed today, if they were not spammed heavily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ritu, your post reminded me of the story of a King who hated mosquitoes but became thankful when a mosquito bite awakened him before the enemies reached to him.</p>
<p>You do have a strong point. Another angle to look at it is how the spam challenge the developers.</p>
<p>I think the Google algorithm (and other algorithms) would not be this developed today, if they were not spammed heavily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
